![]() She told them the country needed to get “deadly serious about this deadly disease.” In 2008, O’Connor spoke publicly to a special Senate committee on aging about the difficulties of caring for a loved one with Alzheimer’s disease. In this March 9, 2004, photo, then-Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and her husband John, attend an awards ceremony in Huntington, N.Y. She also supported a relationship her husband developed with another woman in the care facility where he lived in Arizona. She spoke publicly about the challenges of having a loved one with the disease. O’Connor’s husband died of complications from Alzheimer’s in 2009. She kept an active, public schedule as an elder stateswoman until she withdrew from public life after she began to show signs of dementia, which she announced in 2018. She taught a class at both of Arizona’s public law schools, at the University of Arizona and Arizona State University. She even served as a visiting judge and occasionally heard cases. She regularly appeared in public, at speaking events and as a special guest. She launched initiatives to advance civics education and served as chancellor of the College of William & Mary in Virginia. That gave her many more years to serve the public in other capacities, from sitting on boards to starting organizations to teaching. She stepped down at 75, a relatively young age, and while she was still in good health, to help care for her husband, John Jay O’Connor. Supreme Court in 2006, she didn’t live the life of a quiet retiree. Read the first chapter: An Arizona original with rancher valuesĪfter Sandra Day O’Connor left the U.S. And when she was replaced by Samuel Alito, that center fell out.Editor’s note: This is the 10th of The Arizona Republic’s 11-chapter profile of retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. The decisive change was that O’Connor, love her or hate her, was truly a centrist pragmatist. And the new test that Sam Alito has been a proponent of has been dramatically to the right of that center place.Į often make the mistake of thinking that John Roberts was really the decisive change at the court. When O’Connor left the court and Sam Alito came onto the court, in every one of those issues that test is gone. “In every issue that we looked at this year - abortion, church/state, campaign finance, every one of these blockbuster issues - what held sway was O’Connor’s test. Lithwick adds that the substitution of Justice Samuel Alito for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who she describes as holding a moderate, middle position on the court, has been the most “consequential” change to the Roberts court: ![]() Greenhouse tells Moyers, “Let’s be impolite and point out that all five of them are Roman Catholic and in service of an agenda by a couple of presidents who were elected on a Republican Party platform that called for picking judges who would overturn Roe v. ![]() In Bill’s conversation this week with Linda Greenhouse, a New York Times columnist and Dahlia Lithwick, a senior editor at Slate, he asked what they thought about the ruling. Hobby Lobby, the majority ruled that closely held for-profit corporations are “persons” under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and shouldn’t have to provide free contraception to female employees as required by the Affordable Care Act. The Supreme Court’s term ended last week with an extremely controversial decision on women’s healthcare.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |